
The ECN No Name Newsletter is no longer being published. This is an archived issue.
[previous article] [next article]Starr Williams
Most of you already know the basics of how to reply to your e- mail messages, but what some of you don't know is that you can reply to your e-mail messages using a more thoughtful and complete technique.
Just as there is... ...Dating etiquette - if you ask someone to go out on a date, then you should offer to pay ...Golf etiquette - allow faster players to play through ...Dinner etiquette - when invited to someone's home for dinner, don't go empty handedThere is also...
...E-mail etiquette - when replying to a message don't just send back your response as a stand-alone message. Include a copy of the original message (the one you are replying to) with your answer; thereby, giving the recipient the courtesy of being reminded which e-mail message your response relates to.
If you are using UNIX mail to read messages stored in your mailspool and wish to respond to the third message...
1.) After reading the e-mail message, to reply type "r" at
the ampersand and then press the "Return" key.
2.) Now after the addressee and subject are automatically
placed on your screen, type "~m3" . This code means: ~ =
calling an e-mail escape, m = tells the mail handler to read
in a message from the mailspool, 3 = the number of the
message you wish included. You can then proceed with the
body of your message, typing "control-d" to send off your
reply.
The person to whom you are sending a reply will upon reading
his e-mail receive both his message that he sent you along
with your reply.
Some people do this in reverse order; type in their reply
then read-in the original message. The advantage of this
procedure is that your response appears first and the
recipient need only read his original message following your
answer if he wishes to review what he asked.
Although this process is not a necessity when replying to your
e-mail it can be very beneficial to the person receiving mail.
For example, without including the original message, confusion
could easily occur if the sender of the original message did not
remember the order of the queries!