|
|
|
Alternative
Material Dowel Bars for Rigid
Pavement Joints
The Need
|
Over the last thirty to forty years, dowel
support of the joint in Rigid Joint Pavement (RJP) has been widely used. Because the joint
dowels are at the edge of the slab, they are subject to drainage exposure of the metal to
road salts and moisture. The exposure often results in corrosion of the metallic dowel
itself. As the dowel must be free moving to transfer the wheel loads of traffic from one
slab to the next, corrosion product can lock the dowel in place defeating its purpose. |

Alternative material for composite
dowel bar |
| This forces the load onto the
concrete itself at the slab edge resulting in excessive stresses which crack and spoil the
joint edges. The cracking and deterioration of the joint eventually results in the
replacement of the entire slab or the replacement of the concrete near the joint area. If
corrosion damage to the dowel bar could be eliminated, pavement life could be extended
with major cost savings accruing to the owner from reduced rehabilitation costs and/or
replacement of the pavement. |
The Technology
|
The problem of deterioration of concrete
pavement joints has resulted in the search for alternate solutions. Fiber-reinforced
polymer (FRP) and stainless steel represent corrosion resistant alternatives to
conventional galvanized steel in this application. Stainless steel have very good resistance to chlorides. This is a necessity since
heavy use of road salts in the northern United States and Canada have resulted in pavement
and joint deterioration. States such as Ohio, New Jersey and Pennsylvania during the l980s
and early 1990s had limited experimentation with stainless or stainless clad dowel bars.
However, no fully encompassing performance analysis of the performance of these joints was
done relative to alternative materials. The recently study by the FHWA of Alternative
Materials for Highway Construction demonstrated the outstanding corrosion resistance of
stainless steel as compared to many other construction alternative materials such as
copper, galvanized, nickel coated and epoxy coated products. Further, as this is a moving
part the material used must have good abrasion resistance. Coated products run the risk of
the outer corrosion resistant layer of material being worn away or otherwise damaged. The
study demonstrated that even with extended wet-dry cycles of exposure to fluids of high
chloride content, at various temperatures and PH levels, stainless steel had corrosion
resistance hundreds and in many cases thousands of times the corrosion resistance of the
alternative materials tested. The ongoing nature of the corrosion problem in highway
joints and dowel bars and the recently reported results of the study has renewed interest
in using stainless steel in this application. |
The Benefits
|
- High General Corrosion Resistance Chloride Resistance
- Ductility at low temperatures
- Fire and Heat resistant
- Superior Shock and Seismic Loading Resistance
- Minimum Maintenance
- Resistant to Localized Corrosion
- Mechanisms (Crevice, pitting, stress corrosion)
- Superior Strength Levels
- Ease of Storage in field
- No Special Coating Required
- Abrasion Resistant
- Long Shelf and Service Life
|
Status
|
Several states including Wisconsin, Iowa,
Illinois, Kansas and Ohio have volunteered to put in significant runs of pavement using
solid stainless bars or a dowel consisting of a welded tube (0.165 inches thick) filled
with a grout center. The program will be run in conjunction with the Federal Highways
Administration High Performance Concrete Program. In 1998 and 1999 installations of dowel
bars have been completed in various states. Additional installations are expected in
Kansas, Pennsylvania and Minnesota. |
Barriers
|
The barriers to further and continued
use of stainless dowels bars are primarily two.
- Obvious higher initial cost of stainless steel whether supplied as a
solid stainless bar or a composite material with a stainless outer shell and a center of
grout, concrete or carbon steel.
- Difficulty of assessment on the breath and cost of current practices:
Although corrosion of the dowel and freezing of the dowel within the joint is recognized
as a primary cause of joint failure and distressed joints in rigid joint pavement, there
are other factors involved in many failures.
Due to the lack of data in most DOTs to make an engineering
assessment of the cost of corrosion associated with the failures and subsequent repairs,
it makes it difficult to present a savings figure to offset the higher initial cost of
stainless. In addition the availability of composite products has not been widespread
until recently and even then carbon steel centered products must be imported. |
Points of Contact
- Mr.Bernard H Neuhart, 766 Huntington Drive, Niskaynna, New
York 12309, Tel:(518)372-3936, Fax: (518)372-7443, E-mail: karobene@aol.com
- Mr. Brian Leslie, 3050 K Street, NW Suite 200, Washington
DC. 20007, Tel:(202)342-8630, Fax: (202)338-5534, <http://www.ssina.com/index.html>
- Mr. David Reynaud, Civil Engineering
Research Foundation, Tel: (202)842-0555, e-mail: dreynaud@cerf.org
References
- Stainless Steel Dowel Bars - product brochure, Specialty
Steel Industry of North America (SSINA)
- Civil Engineering Research Foundation(CERF), Highway
Innovative Technology Evaluation Center (HITEC), Alternative Material Dowel Bars for Rigid
Pavement Joints, <http://www.cerf.org/hitec/eval/ongoing/dowel.htm>
Disclaimer Statement
|
Neither the Construction
Industry Institute nor Purdue University in any way endorses this
technology or represents
that the information presented can be relied upon without further investigation. |
SL21 |
|
| Last Modified: Tuesday, 29-Jul-08 13:38:36 EDT |
|
|